The Chandra Multiwavelength Project:Galactic Plane Survey Chandra X-ray Observatory National Optical Astronomy Observatory



The ChaMPlane survey is being conducted at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics.

Rapid Release Area

here we provide images/ finding charts and tables for new transients that may happen to fall within ChaMPlane survey coverage.


Sep, 7, 2011 (ATel #3634)

Pre-outburst optical/NIR observations of the field around the
accreting millisecond X-ray pulsar IGR J17498-2921

M. van den Berg (Utrecht, CfA), J. Grindlay, P. Zhao, J. Hong,
M. Servillat (CfA)

We report on pre-outburst optical (VRIHalpha) and near-infrared (NIR;
JHKs) imaging observations of the field containing the newly
discovered transient accreting milli-second X-ray pulsar IGR
J17498-2921 (ATel #3551). The observations were done with the Mosaic
(optical) and ISPI (NIR) cameras on the CTIO-4m Blanco telescope as
part of our X-ray and optical/NIR Bulge Latitude Survey.

The optical images were taken on 2008 May 10. The astrometric
calibration has an uncertainty of ~0.1" in each coordinate. The R
(1200 sec total exposure time), I (540 sec), and Halpha (4500 sec)
images show a source at RA(J2000)=17h 49m 55.34s, Dec(J2000)=-29d 19m
19.7s. At an offset of 0.16", this is consistent with the Chandra
position. The Mosaic source lies 0.79" from the proposed optical
counterpart found in Sloan i' images from the 2m Faulkes Telescope
South taken during the ongoing outburst (ATel #3622). Given the error
on the Faulkes position (0.3"), and the absence of other sources in
the Mosaic and Faulkes images within 1.8" of the Chandra position, we
consider our Mosaic source and the proposed optical counterpart to be
the same. We note that the finding charts of ATel #3622 suggest that
the proposed counterpart is closer to the Chandra position than 0.79",
so we suspect that there may be a mistake in the reported
position. The magnitudes of our Mosaic source are R=23.2(2),
I=21.06(5), and Halpha-R=0.4(3). The values in brackets give the
internal errors of the PSF-photometry routine, while photometric
calibration errors are on the order of 0.1 mag (Zhao et al. 2005, ApJS
161, 429). We have used the transformation equations in Jordi et
al. 2006, A&A, 460, 339 to convert our I magnitude to the Sloan i'
band, which gives i'=21.9(2). This is consistent with the magnitude of
i'=22.5(7) in ATel #3622. As the true counterpart is expected to show
a large difference between the outburst and pre-outburst optical
magnitudes, it is likely that the proposed counterpart is a chance
alignment. The distance estimate for the X-ray pulsar (7.6 kpc; ATel
#3568) and column density derived from the X-ray spectrum (3e22 cm-2;
ATel #3555) also suggest that the optical source is an unassociated
foreground source.

At an offset of 0.16", the astrometric match found in pre-outburst NIR
images reported in ATel #3562 is consistent with a source in our ISPI
images from 2008 July 31 found at RA(J2000)=17h 49m 55.34s,
Dec(J2000)=-29d 19m 19.6s (error 0.13" in each coordinate). With
J=17.3(1), H=15.7(1), and Ks=15.0(1) the ISPI magnitudes are
consistent with the values from ATel #3562. 

Finding charts of the field:


left  = Mosaic I image
right = ISPI Ks image
blue circle   = Chandra position with 0.6" radius (ATel 3606)
cyan circle   = proposed optical ID (ATel 3622)
red circle    = NIR match (ATel 3562)
yellow circle = matching ISPI source
green circle  = matching Mosaic source

  

Aug, 5, 2011 (ATel #3529)

IR counterpart candidates to the transient Swift J174535.5-285921 - UPDATE

M. Servillat, J. Grindlay, P. Zhao, J. Hong, B. Allen (CfA), 
M. van den Berg (U. Utrecht), S. Laycock (UMass Lowell)

Due to a correction of the coordinates (ATEL #3525) of the recent Galactic Center 
X-ray transient Swift J174535.5-285921 (ATEL #3472), we performed again the 
search for Ks-band near-infrared counterparts we reported in ATEL #3481 using 
images of the field we obtained with ISPI at CTIO 4m from 2005 to 2009, and 3 
images obtained with PANIC at Magellan 6.5m (seeing 0.4-0.6") in 2004-06, 2007-08 
and 2010-07 (the 2004 dataset is described in more detail by Laycock et al. 2005, 
ApJL, 634, L53).

We found no long-term variables or astrometric candidates among our ISPI images. 
For the  PANIC images, 2 candidates are consistent with the reported position of 
the transient Swift J174535.5-285921 (ATEL #3472), and one to the matching 
Chandra X-ray source CXOGC J174535.6-285928 (Muno et al. 2009, ApJS, 181, 110).

IR  CXOGC            RA            Dec           K04    K07    K10
--  ---------------  ------------  ------------  -----  -----  -----
S1  transient        17:45:35.774  -28:59:28.75  14.58  14.60  14.64
S2  transient        17:45:35.710  -28:59:29.71  15.06  15.14  15.32
S3  174535.6-285928  17:45:35.662  -28:59:28.99  14.57  14.56  14.68

Magnitudes are in the 2MASS system with an rms of ~0.2 mag, and absolute 
astrometry errors <0.2". Ks-band magnitudes are listed above for each star 
corresponding to the 3 PANIC observation epochs.

Images are provided below. Note that the source CXOGC J174535.4-285925 at the
corner of each image was previously considered a match to the Swift UVOT enhanced 
position (see ATEL #3481 reproduced below).



PANIC at Magellan 6.5m images taken in 2004-06, 2007-08 and 2010-07 
(from left to right). Images are 8" large, North up, East left.
  light blue: Transient Chandra position error circle
  red: Chandra error circle with CXOGC ID (Muno et al. 2009)
  green: PANIC counterpart candidates




ISPI at CTIO 4m images taken in 2005-06, 2006-07, 2007-07, 2008-05, 
2009-06 and 2009-08 (from top left to bottom right). Images are 9" large, 
North up, East left.
  light blue: Transient Chandra position error circle
  red: Chandra error circle with CXOGC ID (Muno et al. 2009)
  green: PANIC counterpart candidates
  
  
  

Jul, 10, 2011 (ATel #3481)

IR counterpart candidates to the transient Swift J174535.5-285921

M. Servillat, J. Grindlay, P. Zhao, J. Hong, B. Allen (CfA), 
M. van den Berg (U. Utrecht), S. Laycock (UMass Lowell)

Following the recent detection of the new Galactic Center X-ray transient 
Swift J174535.5-285921 (ATEL #3472) and the search for potential near-
infrared counterparts leading to magnitudes limits (ATEL #3476), we searched 
our catalog of Ks-band sources and long term variables in the 10'x10' field 
centered on Sgr A* (Servillat et al. in prep). We obtained yearly images of 
the field with ISPI at CTIO 4m from 2005 to 2009, and 3 images with PANIC at 
Magellan 6.5m (seeing 0.4-0.6") in 2004-06, 2007-08 and 2010-07 (the 2004 
dataset is described in more details by Laycock et al. 2005, ApJL, 634, L53).

We found no long-term variables in the Swift XRT-UVOT enhanced position error 
circle and no ISPI counterpart (similarly to ATEL #3476), but we found 3 
counterpart candidates in our PANIC images to the 2 matching Chandra sources, 
CXOGC174535.5-285920 and CXOGC174535.4-285925 (Muno et al. 2009, ApJS 181, 110).

IR  CXOGC            RA           Dec          K04    K07    K10
--  ---------------  -----------  -----------  -----  -----  -----
A   174535.5-285920  17:45:35.54  -28:59:19.9  16.80  16.93  17.01
B   174535.5-285920  17:45:35.53  -28:59:20.3  16.89  
C   174535.4-285925  17:45:35.44  -28:59:25.4  15.49  15.66  15.61

Magnitudes are in the 2MASS system with an rms of ~0.2 mag, the astrometry 
error is lower than 0.2". We give 3 K-band magnitudes corresponding to the 
3 PANIC observation epochs. Source B magnitudes K07 and K10 are not available 
due to a slightly worse seeing at those epochs and confusion with source A, 
but the source seems to be present and constant in the images shown below.

Observations are needed in the next week to test if one of these 3 sources, 
or any of the other IR sources in the Swift error circle, has brightened. 
Crowding in this region makes the use of large telescopes with an infrared 
camera required.



PANIC at Magellan 6.5m images taken in 2004-06, 2007-08 and 2010-07 
(from left to right). Images are 8" large, North up, East left.
  light blue: Swift XRT-UVOT enhanced position error circle
  red: Chandra error circle with CXOGC ID (Muno et al. 2009)
  green: PANIC counterpart candidates




ISPI at CTIO 4m images taken in 2005-06, 2006-07, 2007-07, 2008-05, 
2009-06 and 2009-08 (from top left to bottom right). Images are 12" large, 
North up, East left.
  light blue: Swift XRT-UVOT enhanced position error circle
  red: Chandra error circle with CXOGC ID (Muno et al. 2009)
  green: PANIC counterpart candidates
  
  
  

Sept, 21, 2006

IGR J17497-2821: Additional Optical Counterpart Identifications 

S. Laycock, P. Zhao, M. van den Berg, J. Grindlay, J. Hong

We looked for counterparts for the new Integral/Swift transient IGR
J17497-2821 toward the Galactic Bulge on a set of very deep
(limiting Vmag~24) optical images taken in 2003 with the CTIO 4m + MOSAIC
imager, as part of the ChaMPlane survey.


Image taken with CTIO 4-m + Mosaic imager in the R filter. Image measures 12 arcsec wide.
Overlaid regions show SWIFT error box reported by Wolter et al, (ATEL #889), 2MASS stars and ChaMPlane stars
listed in table.

There are 7 stars within the Swift error circle: co-ordinates 17:49:37.8,-28:21:18, radius 5 arcsec, reported in ATEL #889. Champlane and 2MASS photometry is summarized below, and may be used for comparing against new observations to look for optical transients in the error circle. ID RA Dec V Verr R Rerr I Ierr Halpha Halpha_err ------ ----------- ----------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ----- ------ ------ 219913 17 49 37.51 -28 21 15.6 22.649 0.097 21.568 0.053 20.068 0.047 21.485 0.066 220000 17 49 37.55 -28 21 19.0 23.263 0.185 21.960 0.055 20.164 0.049 21.778 0.067 220215 17 49 37.67 -28 21 13.4 22.432 0.070 21.043 0.027 19.692 0.020 21.115 0.033 220350 17 49 37.72 -28 21 16.9 16.722 0.004 15.850 0.010 15.135 0.010 15.946 0.009 220729 17 49 37.92 -28 21 14.8 22.223 0.069 21.121 0.041 19.775 0.030 21.088 0.032 220793 17 49 37.98 -28 21 17.5 23.085 0.110 22.182 0.064 -- -- 22.053 0.065 221118 17 49 38.11 -28 21 17.2 -- -- 22.375 0.070 21.308 0.088 22.952 0.133 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Star 220350 is the brightest and also the closest match - 1.2" off the Swift position. All of the Champlane stars appear to be foreground objects and do not lie in the galactic bulge. None show evidence for Ha emission by our established criteria (Zhao et al 2005). Magnitudes have DAO fit errors, not including any systematic calibration errors, which could be in the order of 0.1mag. New observations can definitively rule out any of these stars as the ID, as suspected, by limiting any change in mag. 2MASS_ID RA Dec J H K ---------------- ---------- ---------- ----- ----- ----- 17493774-2821173 267.407266 -28.354818 14.03 13.42 12.41 17493780-2821181 267.407450 -28.355030 14.02 13.17 12.88 --------------------------------------------------------------------- 2MASS 17493780-2821181 has H-K=0.3 which is also consistent with a foreground star. 2MASS 17493774-2821173 is reddened, having H-K approx 1 magnitude. Stars in the Bulge typically exhibit E(H-K) ~ 1.8mag while the range of intrinsic H-K runs from 0 for early spectral types to 0.4 at late M. Hence this star also lies in front of the bulge. We note the reported X-ray properties of IGR J17497-2821 appear inconsistent with stellar coronal emission, and the spectral index is too soft for most Be transients (typically around 1), added to which there is no evidence for any of the candidate counterparts being a Be star. The most likely explanation for IGR J17497-2821 based on X-ray properties is a Black-Hole or Neutron star binary at the distance of the Galactic bulge. The presumed low mass companion would not be visible at any wavelength due to crowding and extinction. New observations taken during the current outburst may be successful in spotting an accompanying nova or brightening in one of the above stars.