 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 Next: 2.5.5 Hardness Ratios
Up: 2.5 Spectral Response
 Previous: 2.5.3 Corrections for Spatial
 
  
2.5.4 Spectral Response Matrix
Using the ground-based data (see Figure 18) we
constructed a spectral redistribution matrix for the HRI.  The matrix
is in OGIP FITS format, and can be used in XSPEC.  We then fit the
pulse height distributions of archival observations of HZ43 obtained
between July 1990 and June 1992 and several observations of AR Lac.
PSPC spectra of HZ43 are well fit with an unabsorbed blackbody
spectrum with a temperature of 0.02 keV ( = 27 for 24 degrees of
freedom).  AR Lac PSPC data was fit by a Raymond-Smith plasma plus a
powerlaw component (kT=0.87 and photon index
1.52). Table 7 lists the
= 27 for 24 degrees of
freedom).  AR Lac PSPC data was fit by a Raymond-Smith plasma plus a
powerlaw component (kT=0.87 and photon index
1.52). Table 7 lists the  values for
selected observations with only the normalization treated as a free
parameter.  The minimum
values for
selected observations with only the normalization treated as a free
parameter.  The minimum  values are extremely high because the
instrument gain is different from the ground-based value.
values are extremely high because the
instrument gain is different from the ground-based value.
To determine how well the ground-based response matrix can be
corrected for the effect of spatial and temporal gain variations we
repeated the fits to HZ43 and AR Lac, allowing the response matrix
gain to change.  This procedure involved fixing the input model source
spectrum and allowing the response matrix to shift in channel space
until a best fit was obtained ( was minimized; see Figure 23)  The model
normalization was also allowed to vary.  These results are also shown
in Table 7.  Clearly, the fits are much improved.
Figure 24 shows the response matrix shift (in channels)
required to give a best fit plotted against the PHA maximum of the BE
data at the time and position of the observation.  There is a tight
correlation between these two quantities, indicating that the BE data
can be used to predict a response matrix gain shift.  There is
increasing scatter above a BE PHA maximum of
was minimized; see Figure 23)  The model
normalization was also allowed to vary.  These results are also shown
in Table 7.  Clearly, the fits are much improved.
Figure 24 shows the response matrix shift (in channels)
required to give a best fit plotted against the PHA maximum of the BE
data at the time and position of the observation.  There is a tight
correlation between these two quantities, indicating that the BE data
can be used to predict a response matrix gain shift.  There is
increasing scatter above a BE PHA maximum of  5.  These points
are all from observations > 8' offaxis, where the
redistribution matrix changes.  To obtain best results, only sources within
8' of the detector center should be used.
5.  These points
are all from observations > 8' offaxis, where the
redistribution matrix changes.  To obtain best results, only sources within
8' of the detector center should be used.
Work is in progress to provide these spectral capabilities to the
community.  Current plans involve a delivery to HEASARC by mid 1997.
 
  
Table 7:
Spectral Fitting Results for HZ43
| sequence | date | off-axis angle |  |  | 
|  |  | (arcmin) | ground-based | shifted | 
| 110196 | 7/2/90 | 1.7 | 247.3 (41.2) | 4.420 (0.74) | 
| 110198 | 7/2/90 | 3.9 | 329.5 (54.9) | 13.46 (2.24) | 
| 141809 | 12/11/91 | 1.3 | 28.94 (4.82) | 3.99 (0.66) | 
| 110207B | 03/07/90 | 10.3 | 302.1 (50.3) | 9.15 (1.52) | 
| 110207A | 03/07/90 | 10.3 | 1250 (208.3) | 145.2 (24.2) | 
 Note:  A comparison of  values obtain by fitting selected
HZ43 observations with the ground-based response matrix (column 4) and
the response matrix shifted in channel space (column 5).  Channels
4-10 were included in the fit,  giving 6 degrees of freedom.  The 
reduced
 values obtain by fitting selected
HZ43 observations with the ground-based response matrix (column 4) and
the response matrix shifted in channel space (column 5).  Channels
4-10 were included in the fit,  giving 6 degrees of freedom.  The 
reduced  is shown in parentheses.  The best fit is improved 
in all cases. The fit is still unacceptable more than
 is shown in parentheses.  The best fit is improved 
in all cases. The fit is still unacceptable more than  8' off-axis.
 8' off-axis.
  
Figure 18:
The 
           pulse height distribution from ground-based measurements at 
           7 energies within a 1
' x 5' strip centered on the detector.
           The dashed curve in the Boron panel is the PHA distribution of 
           the Al data, and is included to show the full spectral range.
| ![\includegraphics[width=\textwidth,totalheight=0.9\textheight,keepaspectratio]{cal_spectra.ps}](img114.gif) | 
 
LINK TO POSTSCRIPT FILE
for 
  Figure 18
  
Figure 19:
The spatial variation in the 
           centroid of the pulse height distribution in the ground based 
           Cu(0.93 keV) flat field image. The image was first blocked by a 
           factor of 64, producing 32'' pixels with 1% statistical errors.  
           The contours are at PHA values of 4.0, 4.25, 4.5, 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 7.0 
           and increase outward.
| ![\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{gain.ps}](img115.gif) | 
 
LINK TO POSTSCRIPT FILE
for 
  Figure 19
  
Figure 20:
PCV phase observations of HZ43 and AR Lac were taken at many
           positions on the detector surface.  The observed mean PHA of the
           calibration source measurements are plotted with errors against the
           expected mean PHA from the ground based measurements of copper (0.93
           keV).  The line represents the best least squares fit of the data 
           points.
| ![\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{fig18.ps}](fig18.gif) | 
 
LINK TO POSTSCRIPT FILE
for 
  Figure 20
  
Figure 21:
The pulse height distribution 
           in 3 HRI observations of N132D.  The highest gain observation (solid 
           line) was taken during the PCV phase, the lowest gain observation was 
           taken in April 1993, and the observation shown in the dot-dash line was 
           taken in July 1994, just after the HV increase.  Also shown (dashed 
           lines) are the pulse height distributions of the Al-K (1.49 keV) and B-K 
           (0.18 keV) lines obtained during the ground based tests.  Although 
           the total count rate (in all PHA channels) has remained nearly constant 
           (see Table 3), the earlier observations show a downward 
           trend in the peak of the distribution.  The latest observation shows 
           that the HV increase has restored the peak to within 0.5 channels of 
           the original.
| ![\includegraphics[width=\textwidth,height=.8\textheight,keepaspectratio]{n132d_pha.eps}](img117.gif) | 
 
LINK TO POSTSCRIPT FILE
for 
  Figure 21
  
Figure 22:
The temporal status of the mean PHA channel of N132D and the 
           UV calibration lamp (a small area near the center of the detector).
           The mean PHA is plotted for many observations starting in July 
           1990 through April 1998.  For N132D, the marker type specifies
           the high voltage level(HV).
| ![\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{temp_gain_hri.ps}](img118.gif) | 
 
LINK TO POSTSCRIPT FILE
for 
  Figure 22
  
Figure 23:
The response matrix (solid line) convolved 
           with a 0.02 keV blackbody shifted in channel space to give the best fit 
           to an observation of HZ43 (crosses) in the top panel. The bottom panel 
           displays the residuals.
| ![\includegraphics[angle=270,width=0.9\textwidth]{fit.ps}](img119.gif) | 
 
LINK TO POSTSCRIPT FILE
for 
  Figure 23
  
Figure 24:
Response matrix shift (in channels) required 
           to give a best fit plotted against the PHA maximum of the Bright Earth 
           data for observations of two standards, AR Lac and HZ43.
| ![\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{hz43_and_arlac.ps}](hz43_and_arlac.gif) | 
 
LINK TO POSTSCRIPT FILE
for 
  Figure 24
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 Next: 2.5.5 Hardness Ratios
Up: 2.5 Spectral Response
 Previous: 2.5.3 Corrections for Spatial
rsdc@cfa.harvard.edu 
1999-05-25