May 7th, 2009| 02:22 pm | Posted by hlee

Almost 100 years ago, A.S. Eddington stated in his book *Stellar Movements* (1914) that

…in calculating the mean error of a series of observations it is preferable to use the simple mean residual irrespective of sign rather than the mean square residual

Such eminent astronomer said already *least absolute deviation* over *chi-square*, if I match *simple mean residual* and *mean square residual* to relevant methodologies, in order. Continue reading ‘a century ago’ »

Tags:

chi-square minimization,

Eddington,

inference,

LAD,

Laplace,

mse,

PyMC,

Python,

R.A.Fisher,

utility function Category:

Astro,

Cross-Cultural,

Quotes,

Stat,

Uncertainty |

Comment
Mar 13th, 2008| 01:53 pm | Posted by vlk

During the runup to his recent talk on logN-logS, Andreas mentioned how sometimes people are confused about the variety of statistical biases that afflict surveys. They usually know what the biases are, but often tend to mislabel them, especially the Eddington and Malmquist types. Sort of like using “your” and “you’re” interchangeably, which to me is like nails on a blackboard. So here’s a brief summary: Continue reading ‘Eddington versus Malmquist’ »