Posts tagged ‘E. L. Lehmann’

Dec 7th, 2009| 11:46 pm | Posted by hlee

He was one of the frequently cited statisticians in this slog because of his influence in statistics. It is extremely difficult to avoid his textbooks and his establishment of theoretical statistics when one begins to comprehend and to appreciate the modern theoretical statistics. To me, **Testing Statistical Hypotheses** and **Theory of Point Estimation** are two pillars of graduate statistical education. In addition, **Elements of Large Sample Theory** and **Nonparametrics: Statistical Methods Based on Ranks** are also eye openers. Continue reading ‘Erich Lehmann’ »

Apr 22nd, 2009| 02:02 pm | Posted by hlee

I was reading Lehmann’s memoir on his friends and colleagues who influence a great deal on establishing his career. I’m happy to know that his meeting Landau, Courant, and Evans led him to be a statistician; otherwise, we, including astronomers, would have had very different textbooks and statistical thinking would have been different. On the other hand, I was surprised to know that he chose statistics over physics due to his experience from Cambridge (UK). I thought becoming a physicist is more preferred than becoming a statistician during the first half of the 20th century. At least I felt that way, probably it’s because more general science books in physics and physics related historic events were well exposed so that I became to think that physicists are more cooler than other type scientists. Continue reading ‘[Book] The Physicists’ »

Tags:

book,

Durrenmatt,

E. L. Lehmann,

Heisenberg,

physicists,

statistician,

uncertainty principle Category:

Cross-Cultural,

Misc,

Physics,

Quotes,

Stat,

Uncertainty |

Comment
Jun 26th, 2008| 08:03 pm | Posted by hlee

What if R. A. Fisher was hired by the Royal Observatory in spite that his interest was biology and agriculture, or W. S. Gosset^{[1]} instead of brewery? An article by E.L. Lehmann made me think this *what if*. If so, astronomers could have handled errors better than now. Continue reading ‘On the history and use of some standard statistical models’ »