Next: 3.2 Point Source Sensitivity
Up: 3. Feasibility of observations
Previous: 3. Feasibility of observations
3.1 General Assumptions
In order to estimate the HRI response to a cosmic X-ray source,
several performance characteristics of the combined HRI and ROSAT
telescope are needed. In the sections that follow we provide
estimates of minimum source count rate detection and expected count
rates from sources. The assumptions that were used in providing these
estimates are:
- The effective area shown in Figure 13 and listed in Table 3
(Table 11.1 of Appendix F) is the product of the XRT area and the HRI quantum
efficiency.
- The HRI point source detection cell size is chosen so that
50 percent of the source photons fall within the detection cell.
Hence the cell size must be matched to the XRT point spread function,
the HRI detector resolution, and the aspect uncertainty (the latter
currently being the largest factor in this choice).
- The HRI background rate is discussed above in Section 2.4. For
the present purposes, the X-ray background was computed from the
spectrum shown in Figure 11.2 of Appendix F, which is a compilation of
Wisconsin and LLL measurements (Ap.J. 193, L133; Ap.J., 172, L67) of the
diffuse galactic background, and an extrapolation of a power law fit
to the extragalactic background. In estimating the HRI count rate we
integrate this spectrum over the total effective area of the XRT/HRI.
Note that the UV/Ion Filter and electrostatic shield greatly reduce
the HRI sensitivity at low energies and that there is a major dip in
effective area at the carbon edge. It should also be noted that the
galactic component of the X-ray background varies with the viewing
direction. We have taken a conservative estimate of the galactic
background in the sense that we use the high emission estimates in
calculating the HRI count rates. In some cases the HRI background
count rates due to galactic emission may be up to a factor of 5 lower
than the value of 1.0 count s-1 used here and section 11 of Appendix F.
None of these assumptions is absolutely correct, but they provide a
typical description of the XRT+HRI performance which may be useful
in preparing ROSAT observation proposals.
Next: 3.2 Point Source Sensitivity
Up: 3. Feasibility of observations
Previous: 3. Feasibility of observations
rsdc@cfa.harvard.edu
1999-05-25