From: quai@cbatmpc (IAUC mailing list) Subject: IAUC 6931: XTE J2012+381 content-length: 3143 Circular No. 6931 Central Bureau for Astronomical Telegrams INTERNATIONAL ASTRONOMICAL UNION Mailstop 18, Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory, Cambridge, MA 02138, U.S.A. IAUSUBS@CFA.HARVARD.EDU or FAX 617-495-7231 (subscriptions) BMARSDEN@CFA.HARVARD.EDU or DGREEN@CFA.HARVARD.EDU (science) URL http://cfa-www.harvard.edu/iau/cbat.html Phone 617-495-7244/7440/7444 (for emergency use only) XTE J2012+381 M. R. Garcia, J. E. McClintock, and E. Barton, Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics; and P. Callanan, University College, Cork, report: "On June 1.45 UT, we obtained an optical spectrum of the USNO A1.0 star 1275.13846761, which is within about 1".3 of the variable radio source (IAUC 6924, 6926), and in turn may be related to the x-ray transient XTE J2012+381 (IAUC 6920, 6922). Preliminary reduction of the 20-min exposure with the Whipple Observatory 1.5-m telescope (+ FAST spectrograph; 0.3-nm resolution, range 400-700 nm) shows a nearly featureless red continuum. The only clearly identifiable lines are H-beta, H-gamma, and Na D in absorption; a strong night sky line at H-alpha makes it difficult to determine the intrinsic H-alpha profile. The upper limit to the equivalent width of any possible He II 468.4-nm emission is about 0.1 nm. A cross-correlation with the Jacoby stellar atlas indicates a spectral type of F3 +/- 3 subclasses for a dwarf, or F0 +/- 6 subclasses for a giant. CCD photometry with the Whipple Observatory 1.2-m telescope on May 28.31 yields B = 19.35 +/- 0.1, V = 18.1 +/- 0.1, indicating B-V = +1.25. The photometry and spectroscopy are consistent with an absorption A(V) = 2.8, and an F3 dwarf at about 3 kpc or an F0 giant at about 6 kpc. These results neither confirm nor refute the possible association of this star with the x-ray nova. If this star is the counterpart, it could be similar to the F-giant companion of Cyg X-2, which shows weak (equivalent width about 0 to 0.3 nm) and variable He II 468.6-nm emission, and sometimes an absence of H-Balmer emission. Alternatively, the star could be a chance coincidence along the line of sight, similar to the case of GX 17+2." (C) Copyright 1998 CBAT 1998 June 4 (6931) Daniel W. E. Green