The AstroStat Slog » IVOA http://hea-www.harvard.edu/AstroStat/slog Weaving together Astronomy+Statistics+Computer Science+Engineering+Intrumentation, far beyond the growing borders Fri, 09 Sep 2011 17:05:33 +0000 en-US hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4 model vs model http://hea-www.harvard.edu/AstroStat/slog/2007/model-vs-model/ http://hea-www.harvard.edu/AstroStat/slog/2007/model-vs-model/#comments Fri, 05 Oct 2007 17:38:23 +0000 vlk http://hea-www.harvard.edu/AstroStat/slog/2007/model-vs-model/ As Alanna pointed out, astronomers and statisticians mean different things when they say “model”. To complicate matters, we have also started to use another term called “data model”.

First, there is the physical model, which could mean either our understanding of what processes operate on a source (the physics part, usually involving PDEs), or the mathematical function that describes the emission as a function of observables like location, time, or energy (the astronomy part, usually the shape of the spectrum, or the time evolution in a light curve, etc.)

The data model on the other hand describes the organization of the observation. It is this which tells us that there is a fundamental difference between an effective area and a response matrix, and conversely, that the point spread function and the line response function are the same beast. This kind of thing, which I suppose is a computer science oriented view of the contents of a file, is crucial for implementing and running something like the Virtual Observatory.

]]>
http://hea-www.harvard.edu/AstroStat/slog/2007/model-vs-model/feed/ 2