[ArXiv] 2nd week, Jan. 2007

It is notable that there’s an astronomy paper contains AIC, BIC, and Bayesian evidence in the title. The topic of the paper, unexceptionally, is cosmology like other astronomy papers discussed these (statistical) information criteria (I only found a couple of papers on model selection applied to astronomical data analysis without articulating CMB stuffs. Note that I exclude Bayes factor for the model selection purpose).

To find the paper or other interesting ones, click

  • [astro-ph:0801.0638]
    AIC, BIC, Bayesian evidence and a notion on simplicity of cosmological model M Szydlowski & A. Kurek

  • [astro-ph:0801.0642]
    Correlation of CMB with large-scale structure: I. ISW Tomography and Cosmological Implications S. Ho et.al.

  • [astro-ph:0801.0780]
    The Distance of GRB is Independent from the Redshift F. Song

  • [astro-ph:0801.1081]
    A robust statistical estimation of the basic parameters of single stellar populations. I. Method X. Hernandez and D. Valls–Gabaud

  • [astro-ph:0801.1106]
    A Catalog of Local E+A(post-starburst) Galaxies selected from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Data Release 5 T. Goto (Carefully built catalogs are wonderful sources for classification/supervised learning, or semi-supervised learning)

  • [astro-ph:0801.1358]
    A test of the Poincare dodecahedral space topology hypothesis with the WMAP CMB data B.S. Lew & B.F. Roukema

In cosmology, a few candidate models to be chosen, are generally nested. A larger model usually is with extra terms than smaller ones. How to define the penalty for the extra terms will lead to a different choice of model selection criteria. However, astronomy papers in general never discuss the consistency or statistical optimality of these selection criteria; most likely Monte Carlo simulations and extensive comparison across those criteria. Nonetheless, my personal thought is that the field of model selection should be encouraged to astronomers to prevent fallacies of blindly fitting models which might be irrelevant to the information that the data set contains. Physics tells a correct model but data do the same.

Leave a comment