[ArXiv] 1st week, May 2008

I think I have to review spatial statistics in astronomy, focusing on tessellation (void structure), point process (expanding 2 (3) point correlation function), and marked point process (spatial distribution of hardness ratios of X-ray distant sources, different types of galaxies -not only morphological differences but other marks such as absolute magnitudes and existence of particular features). When? Someday…

In addition to Bayesian methodologies, like this week’s astro-ph, studies on characterizing empirical spatial distributions of voids and galaxies frequently appear, which I believe can be enriched further with the ideas from stochastic geometry and spatial statistics. Click for what was appeared in arXiv this week.

  • [astro-ph:0805.0156]R. D’Abrusco, G. Longo, N. A. Walton
    Quasar candidates selection in the Virtual Observatory era

  • [astro-ph:0805.0201] S. Vegetti& L.V.E. Koopmans
    Bayesian Strong Gravitational-Lens Modelling on Adaptive Grids: Objective Detection of Mass Substructure in Galaxies (many like to see this paper: nest sampling implemented, discusses penalty function and tessllation)

  • [astro-ph:0805.0238] J. A. Carter et al.
    Analytic Approximations for Transit Light Curve Observables, Uncertainties, and Covariances

  • [astro-ph:0805.0269] S.M.Leach et al.
    Component separation methods for the Planck mission

  • [astro-ph:0805.0276] M. Grossi et al.
    The mass density field in simulated non-Gaussian scenarios

  • [astro-ph:0805.0790] Ceccarelli, Padilla, & Lambas
    Large-scale modulation of star formation in void walls
    [astro-ph:0805.0797] Ceccarelli et al.
    Voids in the 2dFGRS and LCDM simulations: spatial and dynamical properties

  • [astro-ph:0805.0875] S. Basilakos and L. Perivolaropoulos
    Testing GRBs as Standard Candles

  • [astro-ph:0805.0968] A. A. Stanislavsky et al.
    Statistical Modeling of Solar Flare Activity from Empirical Time Series of Soft X-ray Solar Emission
One Comment
  1. vlk:

    Stanislavsky et al (astro-ph:0805.0968) show a very strange result. If I understand the notation correctly, they say that the slope of the cumulative power-law steepens above the critical value (alpha=1 in their notation) during times of high activity. This is odd, because innumerable measurements have shown the index to be 0.8 (or 1.8 in differential form) over 6 orders of magnitude in flare energy deposition, and furthermore, any hints of steepening are at the low-energy end, which would presumably come to the fore during periods of low activity. One possible reason for the discrepancy (as Kelly and Steve pointed out) is that they do not account for background in the GOES data. So weaker flares get a larger systematic bump in their estimated energies compared to stronger flares, which would naturally show up as a steepening of the distribution as the background increases during times of high activity.

    05-12-2008, 2:14 pm
Leave a comment