Comments on: [ArXiv] Swift and XMM measurement errors, Sep. 8, 2007 http://hea-www.harvard.edu/AstroStat/slog/2007/arxiv-swift-and-xmm-measurement-errors/ Weaving together Astronomy+Statistics+Computer Science+Engineering+Intrumentation, far beyond the growing borders Fri, 01 Jun 2012 18:47:52 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4 By: vlk http://hea-www.harvard.edu/AstroStat/slog/2007/arxiv-swift-and-xmm-measurement-errors/comment-page-1/#comment-92 vlk Tue, 11 Sep 2007 13:26:07 +0000 http://hea-www.harvard.edu/AstroStat/slog/2007/arxiv-swift-and-xmm-measurement-errors-sep-8-2007/#comment-92 That is an interesting approach to pileup! (Or so I gather from a quick reading.) Rather than try to model the effect of pileup (which is what happens when more than one event is detected within a single frame, thus collapsing the multiple events into a single one), they have taken the opposite route, of simply setting the error bars to be larger. Note also that this just modifies the error bar on the counts, and not on the energies, which is what Yaming has wrestled with in the context of ACIS data. That is an interesting approach to pileup! (Or so I gather from a quick reading.) Rather than try to model the effect of pileup (which is what happens when more than one event is detected within a single frame, thus collapsing the multiple events into a single one), they have taken the opposite route, of simply setting the error bars to be larger.

Note also that this just modifies the error bar on the counts, and not on the energies, which is what Yaming has wrestled with in the context of ACIS data.

]]>