If you have any questions, please contact Dr. Almus Kenter at akenter@cfa.harvard.eduHRC-I Calibration Data Products - Pre-fix
(as of 1 May 1998)Postscript file describing data products.
Table of Contents
QE, Gain, and Degap
Background Map
HRC-I Out-of-Band QE and Effective Area
Spatial Scale
Count Rate Linearity
Point Spread Function
Quantum Efficiency vs Angle of Incidence
References
ff.fits(binary) - re-binned 64x64 qe map
ff.imgqe_map.ps (postscript) - pulse height distribution, contour, and surface plot
gmi_ff.fits (binary) - degapped flat field gain map
ff.gmi (binary) - degapped flat field gain map image (displayed by SAOimage using -u2 flag)
degap_map.ps (postscript) - degap surface plotsxrcf_bkg_map.fits (Background fits file from data taken at the XRCF; 64x64 w/time to show rate)
all_xrcf_bkg.img (All background counts during XRCF; displayed by SAOimage using -u2 flag)
xrcf_bkg_map.ps (Surface plot, contour map, and rate for XRCF background)
HRC-I Out-of-Band QE and Effective Area
A model of the HRC-I MCP EUV - Visible quantum efficiency. A table of values for the model is provided.
HRC-I UVIS transmission in the EUV - Visible band. The model is based on a witness sample (TF100-1174) measurement (4400-8000 A) and linear attenuation coefficients from the literature. The boxes are two measurements at 1470 and 2537 A.
Table hrci_uvt.prn
A model of the HRC-I EUV - Visible quantum efficiency. The boxes are two measurements at 1470 and 1850 A and an upper limit at 4400 A
A table of values for the model is provided.
A model of the HRC-I EUV - Visible Effective Area. A HRMA collecting area of 1100 cm2 has been assumed (constant over the band).
A table of values for the model is provided.
U, V axis: 6.429 microns per pixel
In focus count rate linearity of the HRC-I at 277 eV. See also Count Rate Linearity of the AXAF High Resolution Camera (HRC), D. Pease and H. Donnelly (postscript file) or HTML file).
Surface plot of the point spread function of the combined HRC-I and HRMA at Carbon K alpha (277 eV). No FAM motion.
Image and best fit Gaussians to slices of the PSF (at 277 eV) along the U and V axes through the peak. No FAM motion.
Encircled energy versus radius of the HRC-I/HRMA at 277 eV. The "secondary image" of the HRC-I
all_5mm_images.img (-u2 format image showing all +5mm defocus images combined to study "secondary" image)
all_5mm_images_img.ps (as above postcript format)
5mm_defocus_img.ps (result of combining all the above into 1 image; lin and log scale)
079_5mm_defocus.imglin_img.ps (postscript image of contour of 5mm defocus PSF ~.5 x10^{6} events)
079_5mm_defocus.imglog_img.ps ( as above log scale)
079_5mm_defocus.imgprj_.ps (projections of above)
Quantum Efficiency vs Angle of Incidence
The relative quantum efficiency of a set of MCPs similar to the FM HRC-I MCPs was measured as a function of incident angle for the energy 1.49 keV at two azimuth angles. We will extend these measurements in our laboratory to more energies and azimuth angles.
The relative QE vs incident angle (E = 1.49 keV, azimuth = 0 degrees)
The relative QE vs incident angle (E = 1.49 keV, azimuth = -180 degrees)
The following diagram defines the angles theta (incident angle) and phi (azimuth angle) for the measurements:
A SPIE paper gives details of the measurement procedures, analysis techniques, and results of the XRCF and flat field calibrations.
How to display postscript plots with the Netscape browser.